google-site-verification=Z_uoRd0b3XdVdrmzeuBxwVnnTutVNUbWIMxE71rh0fU
22 November 2019

Pelvic Mesh Implants: The Johnson & Johnson Class Action

A decision was handed down on 21 November 2019 by Judge Katzmann in the Federal Court of Australia against Johnson & Johnson and related Ethicon companies.

After 7 years and a 6-month trial, the defendants were found to have breached the Trade Practices Act (now the Australian Consumer Law), supplied medical devices with defects and otherwise breached their duty of care to the representative plaintiffs in the class action.

This may not be the end of the matter as the defendants have already indicated an intention to appeal.

As I have noted previously in another newsletter, some claimants will be well served by such group actions. But there are some who would be better advised to seek individual legal advice and assistance from a Queensland based law firm with practitioners specialising in the area of medical negligence.

If a claimant has a significant economic loss claim or a significant domestic assistance care claim, then the best overall outcome is likely to be achieved by specialised attention to their claim alone. Bennett and Philp Lawyers recently settled a very significant claim for such a claimant. By being able to concentrate on her claim alone, a settlement was able to be reached within a relatively short time frame.

On the other hand, those claimants whose employment or income earning capacity has not been affected by the pelvic mesh implant and whose claim is one for general damages for pain and suffering only may be well served by a representative or class action. General damages for pain and suffering are terribly low in Queensland and an individual claim for such a claimant may not be economically viable.

Any woman who has been injured by a pelvic mesh implant where the procedure was undertaken in Queensland ought to consult with a Queensland based solicitor specialising in medical negligence law as soon as possible. There is a strict time limit of 3 years in which to commence a claim in Queensland. This may be extended in special circumstances but again, the sooner proper legal advice is sought, the better.

 

 


Individual liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation (personal injury work exempted).

Related Posts

12 September 2022 Publications

What to Do If You Are Faced with a Section 150 Restriction on Your Health Practitioner Registration

Find out more
29 August 2022 Publications

Some Much Needed Clarity from the NSW Court of Appeal on the ‘Public Interest’ Grounds for Imposing Conditions on Registrations of Health Practitioners

Find out more
18 August 2022 Publications

Health Practitioners Beware of Urgent ‘Public Interest’ Restrictions That Can Be Placed on Their Registrations

Find out more
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Stay in the know

Get our latest news and publications delivered straight to your inbox

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.