4 July 2018

Recoveries Against Related Entities

Andrew Lambros
Andrew Lambros

Recently, Bennett & Philp Lawyers director Andrew Lambros was featured in the Australian Restructuring Insolvency & Turnaround Association Journal.

The recent judgment of Justice Rangiah of the Federal Court in Pearce v Gulmohar [2017] FCA 660 (Pearce v Gulmohar) provides a useful and comprehensive guide to a number of issues that arise in proceedings for recoveries against related entities. This article considers some of these issues and looks at ways to improve the odds of recovery in a voidable transaction case while also conducting the case efficiently.

 

Brief summary of facts

Grass Valley Formulators (GVF) manufactured pesticides. A factory fire occurred in late March 2009 and an environmental notice was issued requiring GVF to clean-up and dispose of the toxic waste.

GVF engaged a waste disposal company (Toxfree) but disputed all the invoices issued. By 30 April 2009 these invoices exceeded $2.5 million, with more still to come. GVF had insurance but it was limited to approximately $1.55 million.

On 22 May 2009, GVF granted Gulmohar (a related entity) a charge over all of its assets. In the following months substantial payments were made to related entities for management fees and repayments of loans. No money was ever paid to Toxfree and the directors subsequently put GVF into liquidation by a court application.

You can find his full article linked here.

Related Posts

10 October 2018 News & Media

PPSA Registrations – Is Your Registration Expiring on 30 January 2019?

Find out more
06 October 2018 Case Studies

Working with operators in a challenging pharmacy market

Find out more
21 July 2018 News & Media / Publications

Winding up Corporate Trustees and Trusts – Is it Completely Different Regime Now?

Find out more
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Stay in the know

Get our latest news and publications delivered straight to your inbox

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.